🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his desire to see critics investigated, exerting pressure on the Justice Department to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's damaging our reputation and credibility," the leader stated last month in a social media message.

"They impeached me, and charged me (5 times!)" he said, mentioning the multiple legal proceedings he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Each have since been indicted, in cases that numerous experts have stated seem to be driven by politics and difficult to win in court.

But the most recent allegations against a presidential opponent, former security advisor John Bolton, differ significantly, legal specialists and former prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's case to James' is like comparing apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a ex acting US attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of Bolton's Case

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges pertaining to the alleged mishandling of sensitive materials. Since departing the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a vocal Trump critic, even to call him "stunningly uninformed" and unfit for the presidency in his book.

Experts contend that while there may be political reasons to target Bolton, the procedures used to obtain an indictment and the evidence compiled against him indicate a potentially stronger case than the Justice Department brought against James.

"These actions that's being alleged is simultaneously more serious and seems to have taken place over a considerable duration," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his tenure as Trump's national security adviser, and following his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton placed the nation at danger by improperly keeping and transmitting sensitive documents to family members using unprotected methods, including AOL. Several of the materials were marked highly classified.

The indictment alleges that at a certain time a hacker gained access to Bolton's system where documents were kept and transmitted an seeming warning to cause "the largest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a court appearance on recently to 18 distinct counts of improperly handling classified information.

Retribution or a Strong Case?

The timing of his charge - arriving on the tails of allegations against James - has renewed concerns about external influence on the justice system.

Trump once implied Bolton should be in jail, and called him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his role, authored a book about his time in the Trump administration that was sharply negative of the leader.

"Undoubtedly that the schedule of this indictment, when combined with others, has prompted doubts about the validity of these charges, and why these counts are being filed at this time," stated Jamil Jaffer, founder and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "should the Justice Department is capable to demonstrate the allegations alleged and show the material is properly classified, his behavior may certainly have violated the statute".

Charging such a high-ranking official for improperly handling classified documents is "rare" but not without precedent, noted Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that involve classified information pose difficulties to try, but they can and are brought against both low-level and high-level personnel, from time to time," she said.

Similarities to Investigations into Trump and President

Trump likewise faced charges of wrongfully keeping sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and hindering their recovery, but that matter was ultimately thrown out by a court official and voided by his return as leader.

A independent investigator also found that ex-President Joe Biden wrongfully stored sensitive materials from his time as vice president, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Trump's sensitive materials issues, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top national security position at the DOJ.

Strict procedures regulate the handling of classified documents. To win a guilty verdict, the prosecution must demonstrate that Bolton knew the information he was transmitting was classified, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone without authorization to receive it.

"Because of the sensitive nature of the information at question in this matter, we don't have a great deal of details about why the prosecution contends elements like the personal notes and the other material he shared by email, and the reason there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Conventional Prosecution

The procedure by which the Justice Department brought this legal action will be under scrutiny, following Trump openly expressed his desire to see his critics charged and some of those indictments came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's situation, authorities seem to have followed protocol.

"The Bolton prosecution and ultimately the charge appeared to have followed the standard process including the regulations and norms within the DOJ," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's short, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" document that "explicitly outlines the details concerning the circumstances and circumstances in this instance," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems reasonably aligned with a long line of cases... where government officials mishandled and shared classified material."